Injuries Happen
At the highest level of competition, injuries happen. When you're asking people to compete and push their body to its limits, things will happen. I think everyone would agree we want to try and minimize that as much as possible. But in every sport, people get injured. It's important, though, when one particularly injury seems to happen with a high frequency, that we figure out why so we can prevent it.
This year during the CrossFit Regionals, we've seen a theme of injuries among the male competitors: pec injuries
While watching the first weekend of regionals this year we saw the first pec injury. And then the second. And then the third.
This was pretty consistent among all the regions that have gone so far, so I wanted to do some digging to figure out:
- Why was this happening?
- People do tons of ring dips, why are they suddenly injuring their pecs on a movement they've done many times before?
- Is there a way to prevent this?
- Why are females not getting this same injury?
This article is my opinion and take on the issue.
What do we know so far?
As of this writing (May 30, 2017) I've counted 14 pec injuries (and I've heard as high as 22) from mild strains to tears across the regions, all have been males as far as I have seen. Whether these are injuries to the pectoralis major or pectoralis minor is yet to be seen. I have talked with several athletes who had this injury and are waiting to get imaging in the next week or two.
So why is this happening?
As I watched all of this happen, I started thinking: what is going on here? Why are these highly conditioned and strong athletes injuring their pecs on a movement they've done thousands of times? Why is it only males? Why does it seem to be some of the strongest athletes?
Some of the things I was thinking:
- Which muscle is it? Pec major? Pec Minor? I could see arguments for both (but ultimately time will tell)
- Is it because the athletes competing have suddenly started doing more volume of ring work in preparation for regionals? We do know that increasing volume of training suddenly increases injury risk
- Are athletes doing more single arm dumbbell overhead work than usual and that is overloading their pec major/minor?
- Does it have to do with the depth of the ring dip standard and how fast the athletes are pushing out of a stretched position?
- I hear people saying it's because these athletes are on steroids and their tendons are weak and muscles are way stronger....I disagree. IÂ highly doubt that's part of this equation and I don't assume athletes are taking anything just because they get injured (and it's disrespectful)
None of those seemed to really explain what was happening (except the FAST ring dips out of the bottom).
Then it hit me after a conversation with Nolan Gouveia and Hank Lopez, both from the California region and both having suffered pec injury: they are doing a TON of weighted chest to bar pull ups, 96 reps with a 20lb vest.
Part 1Â of the equation, in my opinion, is the volume of weighted chest to bar pull ups, a movement many athletes don't train regularly aboveÂ
While researching this, I discovered there isn't much research on pec activity during chest to bar pull ups, especially kipping.
But there is research on pec major activity during different phases of throwing, tennis racket swinging, and volleyball spiking. The action of the shoulder and pec in those movements is seemingly more similar than comparing a strict pull up to a butterfly chest to bar.
While the arm is being cocked back and then accelerated forward in those movements (throwing a ball / volleyball spike / tennis serve), the pec major is a heavy contributor.
During a volleyball spike, the MVIC of the pec major was 59 +/- 24%.
During a tennis service, the MVIC of the pec major was 115%.
When the arm is cocked backward in a throw, it goes into external rotation. The pec major has to contract to eccentrically control that motion. This external rotation also occurs during butterfly chest to bar pull ups. Add more weight than the athlete is used to, and it could be a factor in the overload of the pec major.
After this overload, the athlete then goes and spends 90 minutes resting, cooling down, and then warming up again before event two.
Part 2Â of the equation, in my opinion, is how hard and fast the athletes can push out of the bottom of the dip.Â
That may explain why some of the top athletes are having this injury; they're stronger and can push harder and faster out of the bottom.
The other factor with this is to go fast, you have to get to the bottom of the dip quickly. So there is a fast negative with little eccentric muscle contraction and then a strong push out of that position. That's a common mechanism for an injury at the muscle-tendon junction.
It also could explain why males are having this issue and not females. Top males have more developed upper bodies and can push harder, generating more force through the muscle.
Part 3 of the equation, in my opinion, is the longer straps on the rings that may have thrown off the ability to control the shoulder well during the ring dips if it differed from their normal trainingÂ
During event two, the ring dips are done fast and hard on rings with very long straps. These straps, as I learned from the athletes I interviewed, were longer than what they were used to in training and felt wobbly, require more stabilization than usual.
This may explain why event 2 (ring dips) has seemingly caused more issues than event 5 (muscle ups) because the rings are substantially higher in the muscle up. The strap is shorter and therefore more stable.
This Study, for example, show increased muscle activation of the pec major when the apparatus is less stable versus more stable. I think we could extrapolate that to a dip.
After being fatigued from event 1 in the arms, pecs, and shoulder muscles from the weighted CTB butterfly pull ups (that presumably isn't trained frequently), the stabilizing muscles that help the shoulder to move precisely were challenged by longer than normal straps (for some athletes) increasing the demand on shoulder stabilization, which could be a factor in the pec injuries.
Add that to going fast and hard out of the bottom of the dip after all the weighted CTB butterfly pull ups and you could make an argument for where these pec issues are coming from.
What about the pec minor?
It is possible we will hear from people after getting MRIs that they have pec minor tears, but I think that's less likely than tears/strains of the pec major musculotendinous junction.
What I would do if I were competing in an upcoming region?
There are still a few regions that haven't competed yet and I am sure this pec issue is on the minds of the competitors.
My opinion is this:
- I would consider doing less chest to bar pull ups and more conventional C-Kip pull ups to decrease the rotational stresses on the shoulder joint that require large pec contraction
- I would break up the ring dips into smaller sets so the pec muscle/tendon can recover
- I would do the ring dips slower and more controlled to avoid really hard pec contractions
- I would stay warm between events 1 and events 2
What can/should we learn?
In competition, injuries happen. It's inevitable that people get injured when you physically have to push yourself as hard as possible. But we should also try to minimize injury to keep competitors as safe as reasonably possible.
This is likely a combination of multiple factors: Fast dips with little eccentric control, large volume of a heavier movement than many athletes train (the butterfly weighted CTB), and longer straps than many athletes trained with.
I wish everyone who had an injury a speedy recovery and hope we don't see any more pec injuries in the coming week.
Thank you for reading and thank you to all the athletes who allowed me to interview them after their injury,
Ryan
Doing multiple repetitions on rings, in fast and furious mode, with all the instability they have, and considering the value of good shoulder health for a good LIFE until old age, is simply a stupid choice, and it is very sad that trainers and proponents of Cross Fit install this kind of madness, for sake of profit.
Cross Fit has originally many good things to it, but it is - to be short - too "Yang", there is not enough "Yin". It is unbalanced. Over competitive. Highly prone to injury. Ineffective in many ways for the average person. And then - faced with a high number of injuries, the response seems to be a combination of "injuries happen" and "let's study why they happen", when it's obvious to anyone with minimum knowledge on biomechanics and physiology (I presume it is the case here) what's going on.
And no, it's no "disrespectful" to consider / assume a high probability that many top athletes take steroids and other drugs to achieve quicker recovery and better results.
Ryan, you put together a compelling case as to why these pec injuries could be happening. If that's the case, it's an unfortunate combination of movements and apparatus that can't really be changed at this point.
If they could change it, I would suggest they swap out ring dips for a 50-foot unbroken slackline walk! That would make things interesting.
Why is this post coming from you, Ryan, instead of CrossFit HQ?
You have observed there is a problem. You are one person.
How many dozens work at HQ that haven't come to the same conclusion, or are reluctant to talk about it openly?
Why are you in support of CrossFit if CrossFit creates the programming which caused these injuries & doesn't want to be publicly accountable?
Hey Philip,
I am one person. I did observe the problem. Many people have yet to compete who will be going through these events. It would be a disservice if I did not offer an opinion and ideas on how others can prevent injuries who are yet to go.
Additionally, me speculating on why people are tearing pecs during certain competitive events isn't me supporting CrossFit.
I don't like seeing people injured. I am also realistic. CrossFit is not going anywhere. I am sure it has and will continue to have its fluctuations.
Hundreds of thousands of people are members at CrossFit gyms because they enjoy it and that's not going away. Some are finding alternative gyms and others are going from other gyms to CrossFit gyms.
It comes down to this: I could either try to add positivity, my opinions, etc to that group or I could shun it. I do not want to shun it. Perhaps I will write an article on this at some point in place of a long comment.
Thank you for your feedback.
@Tiago, I just want to make sure I understand you correctly.
First, to perform practical tasks at speed in a competitive environment is a product of greed and ignorance? So for instance, automobiles are for transportation; driving an automobile around a circuit at 100+ miles an hour would be "madness for the sake of profit" and to risk injury or your life doing it "STUPID". By the way, nobody was making money when competitive CrossFit started, and for all except the very elite it's just free shoes and protein powder. Don't worry I didn't forget the greedy organizers who live stream everything on FB and YouTube for free.
Second; You feel our "yin" and "yang" are out of balance. Fact: CrossFit is the single fastest growing fitness brand for over a decade. Terms like functional fitness, garage gym, paleo and burpee are in common usage today because CrossFit works, ESPECIALLY for the average person, people love it and like the ancient Greeks, we want to know who's best. You have attempted to conflate injuries across CF with injuries associated with competitive CF. It's well worn road that there is NO credible research to support a higher rate of incidence in CF across the general population. On the competitive side, this is a case of a specific movement in one workout out of the 40+ such workouts over the history of just regional level competition. Frankly, it's been two weeks, so since you don't feel "let's study why they happen" is adequate, we should instead guess or assume? I can't decide, maybe I don't have the "minimum knowledge of bio-mechanics and physiology".
Third: You feel assuming and broadcasting someone is dishonest, a liar, a cheat or of low moral character with no more proof than their success shows due respect? There will always be a best in the world and some will use ANY means to get there, but it's an invalid and false to say therefore all the best used any means to get there.
There are two types of people in this world those who love crossfit and those who hate crossfit. Your reasons for hating or loving crossfit is evident in those reasons albeit it factual or not. No need to criticize it (crossfit) or the ones who love it though.
Does chest to bar pull ups and a big increase in pec load really make sense?
It´s still predominantly a pulling action, and according to this 2017 article, the pec major %MVIC was only 45% in the condition that recruited it the most (mind you no kipping and no weight vest), https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28011412.
Increase in biceps tears and weighted pullups maybe?
Yes it makes sense. I read the full text article that you posted before I wrote this article.
The action of the muscles around the shoulder are doing very different things in a butterfly kip vs a standard kip. Just watch athletes do both and think about what muscles they are using as they cycle through.
A conventional pull up is not a chest exercise as that article you referenced would state, and I agree.
But butterfly kipping you have to think beyond what an article talking about essentially a very different lift is measuring.
Thank you Ryan for your perspective. It makes perfect sense and is well thought out. I am especially impressed that you are doing all that you can to help those who have yet to compete, I hope they will listen and take your advice. No where in your article did I see one hint of criticism of CrossFit, just some help for those who may be looking. Great job, as usual.
@Silverback Matt - it's not about doing something fast, but doing something with a high risk of injury and a tradeoff reward/injury that does not seem favourable to most people, not to say to anyone, in the longer term.
You can sprint at maximum speed with no problem, like in your car race example. Because it's a natural movement, because it's locomotion. A ring deep puts tremendous challenges on the shoulder joint, and doing 15 REPS as fast as possible is too insane.
Form should never be sacrificed for speed, particularly when high risk of injury is there.
Sprinting does not represent a risk.
Other exercises can be done at high speed - however, normally "primarily" focusing on speed almost always means a sacrifice for form and the build up of imbalances and making yourself prone to injury.
When I mention the "greediness" I mean it purely from an observational point where I see that doing some things - geared towards Yang elements, like speed, competitiveness, etc - cannot go along with being concerned with people's well-being.
Most snatches done in Cross Fit, even by pros, would not have the "green light" from olympic weightlifting judges. It is a technical move, there is some beauty in it, a properly done snatch should end in a point of perfect balance, where the athlete can hold it easily for 3-4 seconds, because the lockout is perfect, the alignment is good. It's just an example.
From 31:30 there's some interesting points on imbalances created by Cross Fit.
Simply put, it does not concur for life long fitness, a balanced body and a healthy mind.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rLSl8x602MA&feature=youtu.be
Hey Ryan! Great stuff. I assumed the cause was a bit of neural fatigue from event 1 and the catch of the db in the snatch.
The catch in that OH position could also function like a stretch to the pec fibers, which coupled with the neural fatigue could leave the athlete set up for failure. Add in your assertion that the strap length and width lead to a higher degree of stability needed than most athletes were accustomed to with ring dips. The perfect storm for pec tear. Thanks for doing your homework.
Ryan, very interesting and compelling. Not arguing with any of it. As another point of data for you though, one thing people aren't talking about is that this happened three years ago too. I was on the medical team at the Atlantic Regional in 2014 where four guys injured their pecs on the ring dips in Event 6, and had to withdraw. I can't speak for other regions but at the time it was super concerning. With more livestream access and social media it was made more of a big deal this year, but given that the exact same thing happened the last time ring dips were programmed at Regionals, I think that says something.
I believe it's not so much conditions at the competition but the 3+ weeks of Post event announcement training leading up to the competition event.
Athletes took on intense training with more exercises in unstable environment than they likely ever have....leaving them short term with a destabilized pre condition.
Something that must be considered as a safety precaution is announcing these competiton events much further in advance to give athletes a better chance to acclimate to them.